Revisiones de WOT - Navegación segura
WOT - Navegación segura por WOT Services
142 revisiones
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Coiialj, el hace 9 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Philip Goddard, el hace 9 meses(updated 6 September 2023) On the face of it, WOT is a great idea, but it wrongly gives some completely safe, authentic and trustworthy sites a poor safety rating -- two of my own sites suffering thus at the moment. For this sort of thing it's necessary for the site owner to be able to contact WOT admin directly, and not go through the cumbersome, lengthy, and indeed unreliable business of posting in the Forum to get members to review the affected site(s), or/and jump through other hoops -- but as far as I can make out, there are no such means.
Also, crowd-sourced ratings are worse than useless for giving a proper impression of validity, authenticity and overall quality of a site's contents, with regard to any subject matter about which most people hold beliefs -- such as religion, spirituality, New-Age and related areas, and indeed so-called 'mental health' (which is based in the materialistic reductionism belief system). In all such cases, the majority, belief-driven view takes priority over the more rational, objective (observation-based) view, and what the ratings are indicating is NOT any quality of the respective site contents, but simply their popularity -- which at best isn't particularly useful, and generally is seriously misleading.
One of my own sites is impacted thus, and it's galling to see so many belief-based sites (intrinsically misinformational because belief stands in the way of seeing what's really there) getting high ratings just because the respective beliefs are popular or traditional, while my own pioneering belief-free, objectively based site has only a so-so rating despite a string of very positive reviews from people who've genuinely benefited from that site.
Extrapolating from how my own sites are being treated by WOT, it's very reasonable always to be very circumspect about WOT ratings.
**Update, 6 August 2023**
I responded to the so-called Developer response to this review, with a detailed and constructive rundown on the various problems about WOT and asking for my wrongly 'usafe' and 'suspicious' rated sites to have their ratings corrected.
These people are mindbogglinly complacent and self-serving. All I got back was their standard BS line, with clear indications that this was just a pasted standard message, and one has to conclude that the contents of my message went unread.
I've therefore decreased my rating to one star.
I've tried to give WOT reasonable benefit of doubt, but they show themselves to be right out of touch with any sense of genuine human responsibility for what they're doing. Sure, it's a service, but the question is, who it's really serving. Not decent and conscientious websites and their owners, that's for sure! -- The WOT people should be hanging their heads in shame! - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18002124, el hace 10 mesesrecently a few relible and well know websites got red and orange colour for no reason. Tried to contact WOT but got two times same copy / pasted response.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 9 mesesHey there, we would love it if you can share the names of the sites that we flagged, and we will carefully examen them..support@mywot.com - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Matthew Conrad, el hace un añoUsed to be a good sites reputation extension. Now filled with ads and "premium" feature. Too bad! It used to be good and simple!
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace un añoHey, WOT is a freemium service and most of our features are offered for free. Our premium package offers advanced features such as Anti-phishing, Real-time protection and many more features to keep you protected online. We encourage you to contact us directly so we can assist in upgrading to the premium package 🙂 - Se valoró con 1 de 5por pelle, el hace un año
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17832293, el hace un añoMillionen von Nutzerdaten verkauft. Ich wundere mich, wieso dieses Addon überhaupt noch auf dem Browser Addon Markt exestiert! Schmutz, einfach weg damit!
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace un añoHallo, bitte kontaktieren Sie uns direkt, damit wir uns das Problem ansehen können. - Se valoró con 1 de 5por kaiete, el hace un año
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por einwolfsregen, el hace un año
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Pavel, el hace un añonot working((
When I try to use this extension, I see:
300: jar:file:///Users/pavel/Library/Application%20Support/Firefox/Profiles/gnzh2o7v.default-release/extensions/%7Ba0d7ccb3-214d-498b-b4aa-0e8fda9a7bf7%7D.xpi!/
200: filename content-length last-modified file-type
201: META-INF/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: _locales/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: addReview.html 2781 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: breachInfo.html 1655 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: error.html 842 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: images/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: libs/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: loggedOut.html 2545 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: manifest.json 6298 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: offering.html 1439 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: options.html 2687 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: popup.html 1476 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: presettings.html 2288 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: resources/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: scripts/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: slider.html 5906 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILE
201: styles/ 0 Mon,%2031%20Dec%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT DIRECTORY
201: systempage.html 933 Thu,%2029%20Nov%201979%2019:00:00%20GMT FILERespuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace un añoHi Pavel, we are sorry to hear about your experience with WOT. Please contact us directly so we can assist you with any issue- support@mywot.com - Se valoró con 1 de 5por serezha, el hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15658891, el hace 2 añosRubbish. Filled with ignorant reviews from people who don't understand how the internet works and can't change how your profile name appears so you doxx yourself really easily.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can understand why you feel this way and how the extension can be improved for you 🙂 - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Lucider, el hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15151704, el hace 2 añosHard to believe they're still around. No one else has ripped off their users as much as they have.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can hear how the extension can be improved for you and understand why you feel this way. - Se valoró con 1 de 5por WayTooBad, el hace 2 añosThis add-on tags conservative sites as untrustworthy no matter what ratings they got. It blocks them each time you try to visit even after reporting the site as safe. Meanwhile obvious scam sites are not blocked.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can hear how the app can be improved for you 🙂 - Se valoró con 1 de 5por xsSplater, el hace 2 añosПостоянные всплывающие окошки: "КУПИ НАШУ ПРОГРАММУ!", "НУ, ПОЖАЛУЙСТА! КУПИИИ!", "ТЕБЯ ОСТЛЕЖИВАЮТ! КУПИ!", "БЕЗ НАШЕЙ ПРОГИ ТЕБЕ ХАНА! КУПИ!"...
Спасибо, конечно, за ценное расширение, но теперь с ним хуже, чем без него. К тому же, у нас в Беларуси НЕЛЬЗЯ НИЧЕГО КУПИТЬ сейчас. Опять же тормоза и задержки жуткие с этим расширением везде.
Всего доброго!Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosHey there, we are sad to hear about this situation.
Please contact us directly if you have any questions or if there's anything we can assist you with 🙂 - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Naitlydragon, el hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15503330, el hace 2 añosIt's a tracker. That didn't bother me much, but lately it's after your passwords. Now it's malware.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosHey there, Wot's purpose is to keep you safe while you browse online.
We invite you to contact us directly if have any questions, thanks. - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17293278, el hace 2 añosThis used to be a good add-on, but last year they redesigned it to be basically non-functional unless you register for their services.
It also vastly slows down browsing; for me it was adding 10-15 seconds for EVERY page load, and significantly slowing down browsing within pages. This was going on for months, which I attributed to browser updates, but after removing this specific extension the problem was immediately resolved.
You can see in older reviews that they keep claiming this was a bug that they've fixed, which is clearly not true.
Do not install this. If you still have it installed from back when it was worth using, the sooner you get rid of it the better.Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosHey there, thanks for sharing your feedback with us.
The bug you are describing was fixed a few months ago yet we apologize for the inconvenience you're describing.
Kindly contact us directly so we will be able to gather more details and look into it more closely.
Thanks for your cooperation 🙂 - Se valoró con 1 de 5por muddypantz, el hace 2 añosNow charged to simple security. Used to as a tracker. Suggest everyone remove this ASAP
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can hear how the app can be improved for you 🙂 - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Kooxpi, el hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Dakart, el hace 2 añosSlows down Firefox. Leads to memory leaks and browser crashes. Probably engaged in hidden mining. The noble goal to secure the user is no longer pursued by the creators. Shame creators.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosHey there, thanks for sharing this with us.
Please make sure you are using our latest extension because we already fixed this bug in the past.
We encourage you to contact us directly if the matter will not be resolved after the update, thanks! - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Insane One, el hace 2 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por BristolJohn, el hace 2 añosUseless add-on, all it does it promote it's "premium" option. On the first day of attaching it I was hit 10 times in the browser and received four emails about upgrading to the premium membership- whilst not receiving anything at it's basic level. As far as the add-on goes, there are much more open sourced, clear and honest add-ons that offer far more protection and cover that can be selected. I've now directed all mail from them direct to spam/ auto delete (as request to remove my profile has been accepted but ignored!)
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosHey John, thanks for reaching out and we are sad to hear this. Our new version was just released and we encourage you to try it and please contact us directly as we could not find a deletion request from you, thanks. - Se valoró con 1 de 5por alve_s, el hace 2 añosI found out that this extension adds about 5 seconds to all page loads for me, which makes it almost unusable.
I don't know if this is due to another extension I have installed that is incompatible, but uninstalling this made my browser much faster.Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosHey there, thanks for sharing this with us! Our team is familiar with this and it will be fixed in the next version. We encourage you to stay tuned, give WOT another shot and reconsider your rating and review 🙂 - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14711847, el hace 3 años