Revisiones de Video DownloadHelper
Video DownloadHelper por mig
540 revisiones
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Topoide, el hace 3 añosEn el momento que pide una aplicación EXTERNA pierde su calidad de aditamento. Hay otras herramientas que hacen lo mismo sin mayor instalaciones.
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16986351, el hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por mtar, el hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17086048, el hace 3 añosIt stopped saving my video downloads for no apparent reason.
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Ned, el hace 3 añosIt puts a QR on the video now. Before that, it was a good add-on.. Good old days
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Bianca Watson, el hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13925281, el hace 3 añosThe add-on is a good add-on, but the license issues, around $30, is too expensive for a simple add-on. The next upgrade of FF may leave the extension dead, and the $30, in the trash.
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por J. Rod James, el hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Henk Broekmann, el hace 3 añosVery disappointing, It does less and less now. I used to love this but it seems to only do older videos. I have not been able to use on many platforms now. I think its out of date too quick.27/08/21.
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Антон, el hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16995470, el hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por GeoffJ, el hace 3 añosSo, I am trying to use Video Download Helper, as suggested by a user on the Linux Mint Forum. First attempts, and I get an imbeded video downloaded, looking a bit drunk and wavy. Big problem is, no sound. When attempting the download, it then tells me I need a companion and offers either the Browser one or another. The Firefox Browser one does not download sound. The other one has options on versions of Linux, but not including mine, which is: Linux Mint Tricia 19.3 mate. Which one should I use? GJ
Two weeks later, I can download a perfectly good video, but still with no sound. How do I get a video with sound? The sound is there in the original, but not in the saved version. Is this a Firefox error? Firefox has been updated recently, but still no sound. GJ - Se valoró con 2 de 5por GA, el hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14357020, el hace 3 añosIt DOES download many videos from youtube and other sites.
It ALSO hits you with a 28-dollar fee if you try to CONVERT any video!
$neaky. - Se valoró con 2 de 5por yoyomama, el hace 3 años1 star because DownloadThemAll appears to be winning over this extension for permissions
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por zecasadeck, el hace 3 añosI used this add-on a lot and as a way of saying thanks, I made a donation to the developer. Now, they want us to pay some more cash to get rid of a watermark. I don't think that's very fair.
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por TT, el hace 3 añosHave used for a very long time and works really well. However now they have a very large watermark in the lefthand corner which basically makes the video unusable.
I think most free users would accept a level of advertising / watermark, as it is fair to advertise and as for money however with how large it is there is no point to this addon now unless you pay. Such a shame. - Se valoró con 2 de 5por ActionAction, el hace 3 añosIts a memory hog. Why does this feel the need to take up 3-4 gigs of ram when using it? I have to go and kill the process every so often when its being used and kill it again once I'm done
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16915170, el hace 3 añosThe reason why I voted so low is shady practice and low performance. You need to install an app in addition for this to work. The addon pretends to work until you actually want to download something. Then you are forced to download an app. They should be upfront with this and install the app right away. After downloading the video it took ages to process is on modern processor (Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700KF CPU) and only after that you'll get a middle finger in the form on a huge watermark in the video saying Sorry, but you need to pay. If the watermark was reasonably small, maybe, but it's really huge. It's obvious they want it to be as annoying as possible and basically force the user to buy whatever they offer. I would never buy it from people like this. What will be the next surprise? Limited downloads that I can recharge for 9.99 per month? Not eligibile until I buy VIP sub? This whole thing has a desperate scam feel to it. Feels almost like extortion. If you want to sell it guys, be upfront about it and sell it as commercial product from moment one. Or create clearly labelled Lite version where you get what you offer on page one and a full, paid one.
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13397220, el hace 3 añosBonjour ! je ne parviens pas à me servir de cette extension, lorsque j'ai l'impression d’enregistrer, je ne retrouve nul part ce que j'ai enregistré. Je ne trouve pas d'aide en Français à propos de ce module.
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16873662, el hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por nicolas, el hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16863885, el hace 3 añosDe laatste tijd weigert de VDH stelselmatig opnames te maken